By Gary Hooser
The Public Land Development Corp. (PLDC) was created by the Legislature in a manner that at best was unprincipled and at worst corrupt and illegal.
Those responsible owe the people of our state first an apology and then a complete repeal.
Senate Bill 1555, which became Act 55 and created the PLDC, was introduced in the Senate on Jan. 26, 2011. Initially, while establishing a quasi-independent development corporation intended to maximize the development and revenue generation of public lands, SB1555 did not contain broad exemptions from land-use laws. Also, when first introduced, the original PLDC board included full neighbor-island representation.
As if by design, on March 18, 2011, after sailing through the Senate with only minor amendments and no controversy, the House Water, Land and Ocean Resources Committee (http://tinyurl.com/ dyg32jn) inserted the exemption provisions and stripped away neighbor- island representation on the PLDC board.
The only opportunity for public input in response to these critical amendments was on April 7, 2011, in the House Finance Committee
These two maneuvers, executed quite deftly by the House, enabled the measure to reach the all-important joint conference committee without incurring any serious public scrutiny.
Once in "conference" where public testimony is not allowed, the final work on the establishment of the PLDC was a fait accompli.
The Legislature passed out SB1555, HD2, CD1 on May 5, 2011, which created the PLDC, took away "home rule" from the counties and granted the PLDC and its private partners extraordinary powers over the development of public lands.
They made the development of public lands exempt from all county zoning, planning and land use laws, gave all of the power to control this development to three appointees of the governor and took away all neighbor-island representation on the PLDC board.
Along the way, the House Finance Committee said effectively: "Oh, by the way, if you don't like it you have 115 minutes to get down to the Capitol and provide testimony — and if you live in Puna, Hana or Kekaha … too bad...."
The House Finance Committee essentially thumbed its nose at the Constitution and at the general public — claiming it held a public meeting yet making it impossible for the majority of the public to attend, or in fact to even know that the meeting was being held.
The legislative history of the PLDC represents a shameful and incredibly arrogant attitude of entitlement by many at the Legislature. The public is seen as a bothersome impediment and rules are seen as obstacles to be circumvented whenever possible....
It is no wonder people are outraged and demanding a repeal.
