SIGN THE ANTI-AKAKA BILL PETITION
Show You Support A FREE HAWAI`I
Sign The Petition Here - StopAkakaPetition.com
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=7b4721e6-b70a-48b4-8b09-d1374be159f3)
Showing posts with label Illegal US Takeover. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illegal US Takeover. Show all posts
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Thursday, July 02, 2009
STOP THE THEFT OF THE HAWAIIAN NATION
SIGN THE ANTI-AKAKA BILL PETITION
Show You Support A FREE HAWAI`I
Click Here - StopAkakaPetition.com
SIGN THE ANTI-AKAKA BILL PETITION
Show You Support A FREE HAWAI`I
Click Here - StopAkakaPetition.com
Friday, May 15, 2009
DOES THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM STILL EXIST?
The Maui News - May 8, 2009
The writer of an April 23 letter stated "The kingdom was extinguished . . . by dejure recognition of a new government of Hawai`i in 1894."
No nation explicitly recognized the Republic of Hawai`i as the dejure government. They only acknowledged the fact of the republic's actual control. De facto is defined as "In fact a state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes but is illegal or illegitimate."
The Hawai`i Kingdom wasn't "extinguished per 1893 law...."
...The writer is correct is saying "the kingdom was not a wholly Native Hawaiian entity." The Hawaii Kingdom's existing claims are based on nationality, not ethnicity.
Therefore the Akaka Bill's attempts to reduce legitimate international kingdom claims to a race-based domestic dependent entity are worse than "nonsense."
This violates the U.S. Constitution, present day international law and the rights of all kingdom subjects and their Hawai`i-born descendants.
Dan Taylor
Haiku, Maui
The Maui News - May 8, 2009
The writer of an April 23 letter stated "The kingdom was extinguished . . . by dejure recognition of a new government of Hawai`i in 1894."
No nation explicitly recognized the Republic of Hawai`i as the dejure government. They only acknowledged the fact of the republic's actual control. De facto is defined as "In fact a state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes but is illegal or illegitimate."
The Hawai`i Kingdom wasn't "extinguished per 1893 law...."
...The writer is correct is saying "the kingdom was not a wholly Native Hawaiian entity." The Hawaii Kingdom's existing claims are based on nationality, not ethnicity.
Therefore the Akaka Bill's attempts to reduce legitimate international kingdom claims to a race-based domestic dependent entity are worse than "nonsense."
This violates the U.S. Constitution, present day international law and the rights of all kingdom subjects and their Hawai`i-born descendants.
Dan Taylor
Haiku, Maui
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
